Detritus Brings Pulp to Anthology

Dear Partnas in Crime:

Yo boy just read the new anthology Detritus, and he got to say there are many

Omnium Gatherum Publisher Kate Jonez

emotions the stories evoke. It’s a gauntlet of suspense, terror, remorse and so many more of those essential feelings that must be present in order to create a disturbing and compelling anthology.

I enjoyed most of the stories in this collection, which is very uncommon, and I felt each brought something to the overall theme of collecting. And what horrible collections you find inside these pages!

In fact, after I finished the book, I wanted to know more about its origins and the person behind the scenes that gathered so many horribly good tales.

I sent the Pudge Factor in for an exclusive:

(THE PUDGE FACTOR) TPF: Kate, you chose the word detritus for your anthology. That was the first time I’d ever heard that word. Why title your anthology Detritus?

(KATE Jonez) KJ: Shannon (S.S. Michaels the co-editor) and I thought Detritus has a nice ring to it for a word that means something disgusting. It’s a fancy word for cast off crap. Thank you Thesaurus.com.

TPF: Omnium Gatherum is an interesting name for the publishing company. What’s the story behind this name choice?

KJ: Omnium Gatherum means this and that in Latin. I wanted to find a name that could include all of my favorite genres, horror, dark fantasy, transgressive, bizzaro, mythpunk, and alternate history. “This and That Publishing” didn’t sound very scary, so I fancied it up with some Latin, the language of alchemy. Say Omnium Gatherum over and over next time you stir some frog urine into your pot of quicksilver… now that’s scary.

TPF: Detritus was a truly amazing collection of various genres. You had some horror, fantasy, bizarro… a good little collection of different styles. I don’t often see this. Were you going in this direction, or is it just a coincidence that many different genres are used in the anthology?

KJ: Wow, thanks for that. We were trying to get a good mix of stories together because the variation on the theme is what makes an anthology interesting. And I wanted to include the type of stories that coincided with what Omnium Gatherum might publish. We took a bit of a chance including such a wide variety. It’s possible that not every reader will love every single story. But I think the quality of the writing pulls everything together. Detritus offers readers a good opportunity to sample an author or genre they might not otherwise try.

TPF: You’ve got me curious about future projects, because this anthology is banging, baby. What’s in the works for Omnium Gatherum, or is this just a onetime thing?

KJ: We’ve got some amazing projects coming up in 2012. Each of the authors currently published with Omnium Gatherum are hard at work on their next book. And we’ve got several exciting new authors too. The best way to find out about books from Omnium Gatherum is to sign up for our newsletter. We send out news of upcoming releases and offer discounts and special giveaways for newsletter members. The sign up page is here. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Omnium-Gatherum/100738966647365?sk=app_197602066931325

TPF: Do you take random manuscripts from writers looking for a home for their novellas or novels, or do you only look for short stories that fit the themes for your anthologies?

KJ: In 2012 we have just the one anthology planned, Fortune: Lost and Found. This anthology is accepting submissions through March 30th. You can find the guidelines at http://blog.omniumgatherumedia.com/main/books/fortune-lost-and-found/ Right now, Omnium Gatherum is open for novel, novel series and novella submissions. I love speculative fiction with a big dose of historical accuracy or re-imagined mythology. And I’m always interested in transgressive fiction. Stories that challenge commonly held beliefs. My dream submission right now would an alternate history Western with an unexpected protagonist. Oh and I also made this really interesting practice cover for an imaginary book called Finnegan’s Toyshop. If someone wants to write that novel, I’d be thrilled.

TPF: What made you go into publishing?

KJ: Like many people who love books, I’ve been following the upheaval in traditional publishing and the success many authors are having with self-publishing. I did a lot of research in 2009-10 and I found that both types of publishing have strengths and weaknesses. I thought that a small publishing company that combines the speed of production, flexibility, and social media marketing of self-publishers with the attention to design and the editorial process of traditional publishers could be successful by filling the space between the two camps. In 2011 Omnium Gatherum opened for business. I’m very happy with the outcome so far.

TPF: Please add anything else you’d like to discuss.

KJ: Well, there is this one question I have. Maybe your readers will know. When boiling the head of a sworn enemy for shrinking, do you fill it with sand before or after… or maybe this isn’t the place.


For more information, go: http://blog.omniumgatherumedia.com/main/books/detritus/ Detritus page on OmniumGatherumedia.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Interview with Greg Hall

Dear Partnas in Crime:

I’m pleased to present my final interview on the eBook phenomenon to you

Greg Hall

and couldn’t have closed with a better man, Greg Hall, radio personality, horror writer and comedian. I was first introduced to Greg and The Funky Werepig by fellow horror author R. Scott McCoy in 2008 or 09, and I have been a fan of Hall’s ever since. I felt Greg could bring much to the discussion on writing and the eBook phenomenon, so I sent the Pudge Factor in for an exclusive:

THE PUDGE FACTOR (TPF): Greg, I’ve heard a lot of good things about your radio show, “The Funky Werepig.” Is the show focused primarily on horror authors? What inspired you to host this radio show? When and where can we catch the show?

GREG HALL (GH): You’ve heard good things about my show? Who’s throwing out thumbs up comments about the Werepig? People, drugs are never the answer.

Well, that’s always nice to hear. I started the show a few years back professionally as a way to help promote horror and personally because I needed a comedy outlet. I had ‘retired’ from doing stand up and improv and was twitching a lot. TFW is a fun place to party and just be an assclown.

YouTube Preview Image

The original focus was on horror authors but we’ve expanded into other areas. Some film dudes, music dudes, grabbed a great interview with Del Howison who owns Dark Delicacies and has been in a mess of movies. I’d like to book even more when we come back from our vacation. I took the summer off to screw around and everyone keeps telling me it’s time to get back to work. I’m such a slacker.

TPF: I see you’re also an author, having published At The End of Church Street with Belfire Press. Can you tell us what this book is about and why you decided to write it?

GH: Yeah, I have a good amount of short stories floating around out there. But Church Street was my big boy novel. It’s about a group of homeless Goth kids in Orlando who create this vampire Neverland. They start attracting attention and unfortunately a nut job who thinks they’re real hunts them down and rams wooden stakes through their torsos. It’s loosely based on Breakfast at Tiffany’s.

That just happened.

I wrote it actually because of peer pressure. The writer buddies I hung out with at the time where all horror and I was still doing comedy. They challenged me to join their wicked wicked ways. My argument was vampires were vampires, zombies were zombies, ghosts were ghosts- I hadn’t read anything really original in awhile. So why throw more of the same into the pile? I wasn’t going to write anything in those genres until I came up with a very cool twist. Well, during my public stoning I thought about these homeless Goth kids I knew in town and the story unfolded. So for all those public service announcements to the contrary – peer pressure does work. Do what your friends tell you, kids!

TPF: Can you give us some insight into any current projects you’re working on and when they will come out?

Oh hell. I usually work on 15 projects at once knowing that 1 or 2 may actually see the light of day. I’m in a couple anthologies due out by the end of the year. I’m in negotiations to make my paranormal romance Dracula’s Winkee into an animated series. That would kick bahookie if that pans out. If not, I’ll be selling homemade flip books at conventions. I’m finishing up a book that with luck could be a series. And sometime in the next week I got to fold all this life-sucking laundry. We’re outta undies.

TPF: Recently, the eBook phenomenon has become a huge topic of conversation in the writing world. I’d like to get your input on it. These days, with anyone capable of publishing his/her own work as an eBook via Smashwords or Amazon, do you feel this is diminishing the quality of books available to the public. Do you think that the increase in badly formatted, poorly written, badly edited books will affect the future of the eBook market?

GH: You get what you pay for. If you buy easily assembled books from ‘authors’ who put out 72 page novels and self-edit, don’t cry that you were ripped off $2.99. In some ways it reminds me of the standup comedy explosion in the late 80’s. There was a club on every corner, every bowling alley had a comedy night and everybody thought they could grab the mic and nail an HBO special. There was a ton of shit out there but the public didn’t care. They packed these places because it was the latest cool thing to do. BUT out of the thousands that had no reason to be on stage, a solid handful of very talented comics got to work who maybe might not have had that chance if there wasn’t such an open door.

I don’t like reading my book off a flat computer screen. I’m not a big fan of self-publishing, especially without a professional editor. But there are some damn good writers who are getting their work out to the public who otherwise may have been lost in the big publisher grinder. And there are new writers who if they’re wise are learning their craft now because it is easier to get published. Give it a few years. Like all fads, I think we’ll see the weak die off and the public that uses their Kindle to collect books like Facebook friends will move on to the next tech toy. It’ll all even out again.

TPF: What do you feel is the best route for a beginning author? Should he/she take a traditional approach, sending out manuscripts to literary agents and publishing companies, or should the writer self-publish through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and other outlets?

GH: I had already written Church Street but was told I needed short story credits before I could move a novel. I guess that wasn’t bad advice. I learned a lot and grew as a writer for a couple years. It also gave me a chance to network and see who was real and who was a monkey flinging poo. By the time I came back to Church Street I felt a lot more confident and I put out a better product. I was lucky enough to get one of the best editors in the biz, Louise Bohmer, to turn my book into a tight read. And I had a strong legit publisher in Jodi Lee backing it. I suppose if you’re impatient you can go the whole Lulu route. But I never wanted to put out a product that embarrassed me years later. I leave that to my weekly Werepig shows.

TPF: What do you think about pricing an eBook? Should an author who is unknown to the public price his/her books as low as possible?

GH: I haven’t a clue. I know I’ve sold a good amount of e-books- which I really appreciate the support- and have gotten quarterly checks for $1.79. I guess it’s what you want out of your hard work. I want as many readers as possible and if I make some coin, that’s bonus. I never expected to send a kid to college on my fiction writing career. That’s what the lottery is for. So if you want to put a $7 price tag on your e-book and think you can get it, more power to you. I’m shocked people buy my stuff at any price. Except R Scott McCoy. That guy’s a blatant ass kisser.

TPF: I’d like to switch gears and ask about your writing method. How do you write? By that, I mean what’s your process? Do you outline or let the story take you where it may?

GH: Oh hell cookies, I’m all over the place. I have some projects that I outline. Others I just have an ending and a title. Some flow out of me and it’s like waking from a trance when I’m done. I have no idea where any of it came from. Sorry Pudgeman, I wish I could give you a true veteran answer like I only write from 10 a.m. til 3 p.m. while listening to ABBA and sipping Earl Grey. But other than not wearing pants, which is an overall rule of mine in life, I don’t do anything unique.

TPF: Please feel free to add anything you’d like to discuss in this interview.

GH: Only other thing I’d like to toss out there is everyone always searches for the hottest new writers or sticks to the dude who has the biggest following. And that’s cool but I wish people, writers especially, would seek out and read the generation or two above us. The pros that have been living it for 30-40 years. Robert McCammon, F Paul Wilson, Tom Monteleone, Harry Shannon, Chet Williamson, good God, Joe Lansdale…the list is easy to dig up and these guys are still out there doing it. It breaks my banana hammock to see these icons skipped over and their books go out of print. Every generation owes the one before it and we can always learn from what they’ve written.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Interview With William F. Nolan

Dear Partnas in Crime:

In terms of his writing, Jimmy can honestly say he owes much to the teachings

Author William F. Nolan

of William F. Nolan. I was already a dedicated fan, having read Logan’s Run more times than I can recall. One day, I lucked out and happened to pick up a copy of How to Write Horror Fiction at the public library. I sat at the table reading that book until they threw me out, then came back the next day to polish it off. I’ll never forget Nolan’s breakdown of his short story “The Pool.” A light bulb went off in my head about how to write a damned good story.

I realized an interview was necessary, not only because I admire the man for his remarkable fiction and nonfiction, but also to help writers gain insight into his thoughts on writing and the eBook phenomenon. I also wanted to know if the remake of the film Logan’s Run was ever gonna happen.

Without further musings from yo boy, here’s The Pudge Factor with the scoop:

THE PUDGE FACTOR (TPF):  Let’s start with Logan’s Run. What influenced you and George Clayton Johnson to write the novel and what kind of research did you put into it? Did you like any of the many changes they made in the movie with Michael York? One of the things I disliked the most about the film was how they changed the ages of the characters. To me, it was much more shocking for the maximum life span to be age 21 verses 30.

YouTube Preview Image

WILLIAM F. NOLAN (WFN): Yes, 21 is much more effective. No research on Logan’s Run – see the dedication page. The first half of MGM’s movie was OK. Then it all fell apart when the old fool appeared.

TPF: I was surprised when I found out you had scripted Burnt Offerings. How did you come about writing this screenplay?

YouTube Preview Image

WFN: Dan Curtis contacted me, asking me to script the film. I was happy to oblige.

TPF: Now I know you shifted genres throughout your career and man I’m glad you did because you created some of the finest works in horror, fantasy and science fiction I have read. You’re a true pulp fiction writer! Many un-established writers and mid-list authors today question shifting genres because they fear they will be unable to build up a huge following for their works. What do you think about this?

WFN: I shift gears out of a desire to keep fresh. I could never stick to a single genre. Versatility is dangerous to a career, but fun.

TPF: Out of all the novels you’ve written, which one stands out as your favorite or was the most difficult to write? Why?

WFN: The Marble Orchard. I had to find Chandler’s voice since he narrates. A tough job but I think I pulled it off.

TPF: Can you give us some insight into any current projects you’re working on and when they will come out?

WFN: A three-page poem of mine will be out this November in the new hardcover anthology The Devil’s Coattails: More Dispatches from the Dark Frontier from Cycatrix Press, co-edited with the very talented Jason V Brock; we are excited to debut this successor to our acclaimed anthology from earlier this year, The Bleeding Edge: Dark Barriers, Dark Frontiers… Jason was also the editor of my forthcoming Arkham House collection, Dead Man Walking and Other Shadow Tales, tentatively out in 2012.

In October, 2011, Bluewater Productions, who did the Logan’s Run: Last Day and Logan’s Run: Aftermath comic book/graphic novels will be publishing my new series: Tales from William F. Nolan’s Dark Universe; Jason and I adapted twelve of my best stories (six each), and it looks incredible! Jason and his wife, Sunni, are also getting ready to release the follow-up documentary to the one they did about my old pal (and Twilight Zone scribe) Chuck Beaumont (http://www.facebook.com/Official.Charles.Beaumont.Documentary). I’m interviewed in this film. They are now finishing on another friend of mine: Forry Ackerman, and I’m in this one as well (it’s called The AckerMonster Chronicles).

There are several other things in the works, but that’s enough for now!

TPF: Recently, the eBook phenomenon has become a huge topic of conversation in the writing world. I’d like to get your input on it. These days, with anyone capable of publishing his/her own work as an eBook via Smashwords or Amazon, do you feel this is diminishing the quality of books available to the public. Do you think that the increase in badly formatted, poorly written, badly edited books will affect the future of the eBook market?

WFN: I’m not an eBook fan. I prefer to hold a real book in my hands.

TPF: What do you feel is the best route for a beginning author? Should he/she take a traditional approach, sending out manuscripts to literary agents and publishing companies, or should the writer self-publish through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and other outlets?

WFN: Never self-publish! Get some printed credits via small press, etc. and then find an agent.

TPF: What do you think about pricing an eBook? Should an author who is unknown to the public price his/her books as low as possible?

WFN: Yes, keep it low!

TPF: What are your plans for the future? Do you plan to self-publish your works, or will you continue to publish through publishing companies?

WFN: I will never self-publish (well, I did do it for my Ray Bradbury Review many years ago, but that was not the same as a fiction piece; non-fiction and poetry chapbooks are OK, I guess). I have sold to over 70 publishers around the world and will continue this route.

TPF: I’d like to switch gears and ask about your writing method. I think I’ve read pretty much everything you’ve written on the topic, but I’d like to ask you these questions for the benefit of the readers who aren’t familiar with your work. How do you write? By that, I mean what’s your process? Do you outline or let the story take you where it may?

WFN: Regarding short fiction, I get an opening in mind and an end – and just fill in the middle. I make notes, but seldom do outlines unless it’s a novel.

TPF: There have been talks forever about remaking Logan’s Run it seems. Do you know if there has been any progress lately? If so, what?

WFN: Yes, it’s finally going to happen. They have all of the elements in place – Ryan Gosling as Logan, a director, multiple producers and a production company. It appears that they now have a female lead as well. Projected release date 2014. Going to be a MegaBuster!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Interview with Joe R. Lansdale

Dear Partnas in Crime:

There are very few writers in this world that have not disappointed me with at

Author Joe R. Lansdale

least one of their works. Something may not sit right with a new novel, or a short story may not have had an ending that satisfied. Lansdale, however, has never disappointed. Using a master blend of drama, action, horror and suspense, Lansdale’s plots and dialogue are some of the best you can find in fiction. I wanted to interview the writer simply because I’m a huge fan and felt he could bring something interesting to the table. I sent The Pudge Factor in for the exclusive.

THE PUDGE FACTOR (TPF): Let’s start with Hap Collins and Leonard Pine. They’re such polar opposites with Hap being white, liberal and straight and Leonard being black, conservative and homosexual, yet they work so well together. What gave you the idea to create this pair, and why do you think they work well together? Also, which is your favorite novel of the series and why?

JOE R. LANSDALE (JRL): Hap’s background is similar to my own, and Leonard was a combination of people I knew. I also thought it would be interesting to take two people as far apart as they could be in different ways, and yet try and show how, as human beings, they are very similar, and how people this different could be as close as brothers, closer.

TPF: I was pleasantly surprised when I discovered you were one of the writers selected for Rockstar Games’ LA Noire: The Collected Stories. How did you get attached to this project? Also, where did you get the idea to write “Naked Angel?” Have you played the game? If so, how do you like it?

YouTube Preview Image

JRL: I haven’t played the game, but I read the material about it, and I always enjoyed the hardboiled LA novels, especially when I was younger, so it was a chance to do that, and I took it. I don’t know really.

TPF: Out of all the works you’ve written, (short stories, novels, comics, etc.) which one stands out as your favorite or was the most difficult to write? Why?

JRL: I like The Drive In for its originality and satire. I like The Bottoms a lot, and A Fine Dark Line, because they touched on subjects I cared about. I’m very fond of my new book, Edge of Dark Water, coming out from Mulholland Press. I love short stories more than anything else, and like The Best of Joe R. Lansdale and Sanctified and Chicken Fried, and High Cotton collections a lot.

TPF:  Can you give us some insight into any current projects you’re working on and when they will come out?

JRL: I’m writing a Young Adult novel for Delacorte that will come out next year. It’s called Fender Lizards, and the one that just came out is titled All the Darth Thrown to the Sky and takes place during the Great Depression in Oklahoma and Texas. Fender Lizards is too young to be discussed.

TPF: Recently, the eBook phenomenon has become a huge topic of conversation in the writing world. I’d like to get your input on it. These days, with anyone capable of publishing his/her own work as an eBook via Smashwords or Amazon, do you feel this is diminishing the quality of books available to the public. Do you think that the increase in badly formatted, poorly written, badly edited books will affect the future of the eBook market?

JRL: No worse than badly formatted solid books. I think it’s the paperback of the future. The thing that’s bad about ebooks is anyone with the time can put one out there. So that makes for a lot of books to choose from, but it also puts a lot of the control in the hands of the author, and when you can mostly cut out the middle man, that’s a good thing.

TPF: What do you feel is the best route for a beginning author? Should he/she take a traditional approach, sending out manuscripts to literary agents and publishing companies, or should the writer self-publish through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and other outlets?

JRL: I think the traditional route is still the best way to become established. Established writers actually do better with the ebooks, as far as I can see. There are exceptions to everything, but I still think this is generally true. But, it’s changing, and rapidly.

TPF: What do you think about pricing an eBook? Should an author who is unknown to the public price his/her books as low as possible?

JRL: I think they should have some say in the pricing, and it depends. Backlist books should be cheaper and front list books should be cheaper than the hardcovers. If they are ebooks only, then you have to price them reasonably, not too cheap, but not as expensive as hardbound books. My older backlist ebooks coming out are inexpensively priced, but those from Random House are priced a little more. They choose that, not me, but the older reprints, I have a say in the matter.

TPF: What are your plans for the future? Do you plan to self-publish your works, or will you continue to publish through publishing companies?

JRL: I plan to go a lot of different routes. I always have, so I doubt that will cease to happen. I may publish some of my own, and I’ll still do hardbacks, small press, films, comics, non-fiction, you name it.

TPF: I’d like to switch gears and ask about your writing method. How do you write? By that, I mean what’s your process? Do you outline or let the story take you where it may?

JRL: I don’t outline. I just get a mood, a feel, a general idea and I take off. I prefer to write mornings, five days a week, about three hours a day, but that can switch if my situation switches. Lately I’ve been writing a little some afternoons as well. I try to get three to five pages of as near finished copy as possible every day, and am therefore not depressed at the material when I go back and reread it. It doesn’t take a major operation to get it in shape.

TPF: I’d like to briefly discuss the film Bubba Ho-tep. Were you happy with the results, and were Bruce Campbell and Ossie Davis good choices for your characters Elvis Presley and J.F.K.?

YouTube Preview Image

JRL: Plain and simple, I loved it. Very satisfied.

TPF: I’ve heard some talk of a possible sequel, Bubba Nosferatu? Do you know anything about that?

JRL: I think that’s dead, but I can’t say for sure. I don’t really have anything to do with it.

TPF: Please feel free to add anything you’d like to discuss in this interview.

JRL: Hey, follow me on Twitter and Face Book. I’ve moved into the modern world.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kutting Edge Advice From Jeff Strand

Dear Partnas in Crime:

Yo boy used to swing a bush axe on work detail. Some of y’all may not know

Author Jeff Strand

what that is, but it’s a mothafucka to work with, especially under the summer sun in swampland. Many days I’d come home to my little bunk in dorm 5A and be too tired to drink hooch or play poker for cigarettes and Raman noodles. I could have slept a sleep fit for the dead, but the only problem was that there were too many young bucks in that dorm room. Too many noisy, cocky mothafuckas running around at all hour of the night with no clothes on and wired on Bombays. As a result, I found my relaxation in reading. It was around this time when I discovered Jeff Strand, a great horror writer and someone who can get a laugh in a moment’s notice. I needed that back in those days. Strand’s stuff is great to escape to, and I recommend him to anyone. I recently sent The Pudge Factor in for an exclusive on his writing style and thoughts on the eBook phenomenon.

THE PUDGE FACTOR (TPF): Jeff, one of my favorite works by you was Kutter. Can you tell us what inspired you to write this tale?

JEFF STRAND (JS): Thanks! I’d wanted to do a twist on the inspirational stories where somebody’s life is changed when they get a pet, so I made the main character a sadistic serial killer. I wrote Kutter as a personal challenge: to take a completely reprehensible, unredeemable character and…well, redeem him. Charlie is not a suave, clever Hannibal Lecter kind of guy. He’s not a villain you love to hate. He’s inarticulate, pathetic, and thoroughly unlikable at the beginning of the story.

The other part of the challenge was to take a silly premise and play it completely straight, which is the opposite of what I usually do with my books. Basically, I tried to write a dark comedy without actual jokes, and have it be much more heartwarming than you’d expect from a novella about a guy who chains up women in his basement. I’m glad it’s one of your favorites, because it’s one of my own personal favorites of my work, too.

TPF: Of all the books you’ve written, do you have a favorite one or one that was harder to write than the others? If so, why?

JS: My favorite is probably Benjamin’s Parasite, though I’m proudest of Dweller. I’ve found collaborative works to be much more difficult than solo works, but the most challenging book I’ve ever written goes back to one of my earlier books, Graverobbers Wanted (No Experience Necessary), and that’s just because of the whole “whodunit” mystery element. For the second book in the series, I introduced all of the potential suspects and then I killed them all in the third chapter, because I discovered that whodunit mysteries are not one of my strengths as a writer. Mandibles was also a nightmare to write, because it took place over a very short timeframe and I had to juggle several groups of characters. Dweller was challenging, because the “lifetime friendship between a boy and a monster that lives in the forest” concept was tricky to pull off, but the book flowed very well and was never frustrating.

TPF: Can you give us some insight into any current projects you’re working on and when they will come out?

JS: Right now I’m working on the fourth Andrew Mayhem novel, Lost Homicidal Maniac (Answers to “Shirley”), which should be out by the end of the year. I have two completed projects that aren’t out yet: a young adult horror/comedy called A Bad Day For Voodoo, which Sourcebooks will publish in June 2012, and a suspense novella called Faint of Heart, which should be out by the end of 2011 from Sideshow Press. I’ve got various projects in different stages of completion, some of which may never be finished, but just for fun I’ll throw out some titles: Blister, Anything Dangerous, Within, and Deathless.

TPF: Recently, the eBook phenomenon has become a huge topic of conversation in the writing world. I’d like to get your input on it. These days, with anyone capable of publishing his/her own work as an eBook via Smash Words or Amazon, do you feel this is diminishing the quality of books available to the public. Do you think that the increase in badly formatted, poorly written, badly edited books will affect the future of the eBook market?

JS: It’s true that readers have never had a wider variety of crap available for purchase…but at the same time, the bad stuff is pretty easy to avoid. The really awful self-published books tend to have really awful covers and really awful descriptions, and the five-star reviews written by the author’s friends are pretty obvious. (It also means that some excellent books with bad covers are getting overlooked, but that’s always been the case.) As a reader, for the past couple of years about 90% of what I’ve read has been e-books, and I haven’t felt like I’ve gotten burned more often than I have before I got my Kindle, so I think it’ll be okay.

TPF: What do you feel is the best route for a beginning author? Should he/she take a traditional approach, sending out manuscripts to literary agents and publishing companies, or should the writer self-publish through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and other outlets?

JS: If an author chooses to self-publish, they should make sure they’re not taking that route because of impatience. You really do need to take the time to work on your craft. The traditional model, which involves lots and lots and lots of waiting, sort of forced you to keep writing before you became a published author. Now, you can finish your first novel and literally have it available for sale 24 hours later. My first novel sucked. So did my second one. Authors who are taking the self-pubbed route really need to make sure their work is up to professional standards.

That said…you almost never get a publication deal or an agent by submitting through the slush pile. Aspiring authors should be attending (good) conferences and meeting agents and editors in person. Get out there, make lots of contacts, and then make an informed decision about whether or not you should self-publish.

TPF: What do you think about pricing an eBook? Should an author who is unknown to the public price his/her books as low as possible?

JS: I prefer the $2.99 price point, which is as low as you can price an Amazon/Smashwords title and stay in the 70% royalty bracket. Below that, you drop to 35%, which means you have to sell six times as many copies of a 99-cent book as you do a $2.99 book. But some authors have had a crazy amount of success pricing their books at 99 cents. You’ve got the customer mindset of “Oh, hey, for 99 cents I’ll take a risk” but also “If it’s only 99 cents, it must be garbage.” $2.99 has worked out really well for me, but I don’t think anybody has cracked the pricing code yet.

TPF: What are your plans for future works? Do you plan to self-publish, or will you continue to publish through publishing companies?

JS: I’m going to keep one foot firmly planted in each world. I have upcoming books from traditional publishers and have every intention of continuing to sign contracts with them. On the other hand…my Andrew Mayhem series has a built-in audience, and I don’t think a publisher can really bring anything to the project that I can’t do myself. So for the foreseeable future, I’m doing both.

TPF: I’d like to switch gears and ask about your writing method. How do you write? By that, I mean what’s your process? Do you outline or let the story take you where it may?

JS: It varies by project. Sometimes I don’t have a choice; books like Dweller and Wolf Hunt were sold from an outline. In cases where I don’t have to write an outline, I prefer to know the ending and a few steps along the way, but not much else. I like to have the freedom to explore whatever cool and demented idea comes my way! Knowing the ending is important, though, because it keeps me from getting halfway through the book and realizing that I have no idea where I’m going with the story.

TPF: Please feel free to add anything you’d like to discuss in this interview.

JS: I think we’ve covered it. No, wait…there was that one thing I wanted to discuss…I’m blanking right now, but it was important…I promised myself that I wouldn’t end this interview until I’d answered a question about it…hmmmm…nope, I can’t think of it. Oh well. I’ll think of it right after this interview goes live.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Back in Black with Bryan Smith

Dear Partnas in Crime:

Bryan Smith is an author yo boy has read steadily over the years. I discovered

Author Bryan Smith

him when his first book House of Blood came out and remember reading The Freakshow while incarcerated on some bullshit charges. A solid writer and one who I have seen go the self-publishing route, I felt it was essential to send The Pudge Factor in for an interview:

THE PUDGE FACTOR (TPF): Bryan, I still remember when House of Blood first came out. I picked up a copy and enjoyed it tremendously. What made you decide to write that book and what research did you put into it?

BRYAN SMITH (BS): I started that one in 2001.  It was originally called Wrong Turn.  The title only became House of Blood after Leisure bought the book.  Although I grew up as a horror reader and fan, by that point I’d gone some years without writing any horror stories.  The 90′s were a big dry period for horror in general and it seemed like the thing to do was try my hand at mystery and crime fiction.  Back then I had a bad habit of starting projects and not finishing them.  I had a first draft of one mystery novel that I never revised.  Then I wrote most of another mystery novel before giving up on it.  I was in my mid-30′s by that point and was on the verge of finally giving up writing period.  But, just for the hell of it, I decided to try writing something simple and fun.  I made a conscious decision to write a Richard Laymon style horror novel.  I wrote most of that book in about five weeks, after Don D’Auria (the former head editor at Leisure) expressed interest in the sample chapters.  There wasn’t much in the way of research.  I started out with the location, the mountain area of east Tennessee, which I’ve driven through numerous times over the years, and just went from there.

TPF:  Of your books, is there a personal favorite or was there one you found more difficult to write than the other ones? If so, why?

BS: Of my eight novels published by Leisure Books, far and away my three favorites are The Dark Ones, The Killing Kind, and Depraved.  If pressed, I’d have to call my favorite a tie between The Dark Ones and The Killing Kind.  But I think all three of those feature my most assured published writing to date.  The Freakshow might have been the most difficult to write.  Might not seem that way to a casual reader, but it was a difficult journey.  The first problem was just getting started.  It was a difficult time.  I hated my day job and it made me miserably depressed.  And it seemed like during that period I had a lot of difficulty just carving out time to write.  I started, stopped, and started all over again on that thing three times.  One aspect of that book I’m pleased with is that I set out to write a book stuffed with the weirdest shit I could possibly conjure up.  I think I succeeded in that goal, and several of those scenes were a lot of fun to write.  But the other big problem was that I never quite wrapped my head all the way around exactly what was happening in that book, or rather how to pull it all together and make it all make some kind of sense.  I didn’t quite make that happen, I think, and the way I reconciled that internally was just to say, okay, fuck it, this is like a crazy 80′s b-movie in prose form.  Like Blood Diner, Basket Case, or Frankenhooker, that kind of thing.

YouTube Preview Image

It doesn’t have to make sense because the fun is in all the crazy shit happening.  But, considering my lingering misgivings, the irony is the book has been a big favorite of my readers since it was released.  So go figure.

TPF: Can you give us some insight into any current projects you’re working on and when they will come out?

BS: The only thing I’m working on currently is a project that’s very different from any of my previously published books.  It’s a darkly humorous urban fantasy tale that’s sort of a cross between Jim Butcher’s Harry Dresden books and maybe something by Christopher Moore.  It’s gone very well so far.  I’ve written the bulk of the novel in one month, and I hope to wrap up the first draft within another month.  Right now I’m not willing to divulge any further details, primarily because it is so different from all my other stuff.  I want to get it done and then get a handle on how to sell or market it before I start talking about it in any substantive way in public.

TPF: When Dorchester went under, what happened? Did you immediately get the rights to your books, or did you begin writing new ones to send to publishing houses, or did you turn to self-publishing?

BS: When Dorchester started having problems, there was a lot of confusion at first. There still is, actually, but much more so at the outset.  No one really understood fully what was happening.  I thought at first I might stick around with them and see if they could turn things around.  But I changed my wind when they fired Don D’Auria.  I knew then I wanted nothing further to do with them.  After some negotiation, I got the print rights to all my Leisure releases back, and Deadite Press will be reissuing those through this year and into 2012.  I get the electronic rights to all those books back at the end of this year, after which I’ll put out my own digital editions.

TPF: Recently, the eBook phenomenon has become a huge topic of conversation in the writing world. I’d like to get your input on it. These days, with anyone capable of publishing his/her own work as an eBook via Smashwords or Amazon, do you feel this is diminishing the quality of books available to the public. Do you think that the increase in badly formatted, poorly written, badly edited books will affect the future of the eBook market?

BS: I don’t know that it’s diminishing the overall quality of anything.  It’s like with any other major advance or technological revolution.  There’s a period of adjustment and sorting out.  Over time, consumers will become savvy and find reliable forums and methods for identifying which self-published eBooks are worthy of their attention.  Of course, no one wants to read a badly formatted eBook, which is why self-publishers either need to put in the time necessary to learn how to do it right themselves or else pay a professional to do it for them.  So far I’ve self-published three eBooks–Darkened, House of Blood: The Authorized Edition, and Rock and Roll Reform School Zombies (though Deadite Press does the paperback of that last one).  I’m not a coding whiz myself, so in each case so far I’ve hired someone else to do it.  I think it’s a worthwhile investment.  From a writer’s perspective, I’m all for the eBook revolution.  For writers with a fanbase of any significance, there’s good money to be made in it.  In the future, I’ll be dabbling much more in that arena while at the same time continuing to work with traditional publishers.

TPF: What do you feel is the best route for a beginning author? Should he/she take a traditional approach, sending out manuscripts to literary agents and publishing companies, or should the writer self-publish through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and other outlets?

BS: I’ve never had an agent, so I can’t talk about that end of it.  If you’re just starting out and you have a product you’re convinced is good, I’d probably suggest starting out by submitting through the traditional methods.  You don’t have any kind of fanbase at all at that point anyway, so you might as well start by shooting for the top.  If you’re rejected, so what?  You just keep writing and move on to the next target on your submissions list.  If you have multiple unpublished novels, maybe then you might want to consider putting one up on Amazon as an experiment.  Go all out promoting the hell out of it while continuing to market your other books the traditional way.  In a case like that, it might be a good way to build some initial buzz.  The key, though, is that the book you choose to put out there on your own has to be as good as anything else you’re trying to sell.

TPF: What do you think about pricing an eBook? Should an author who is unknown to the public price his/her books as low as possible?

BS: I think eBooks should be priced fairly low in general because there is no physical component to the product.  If there is no cost expended for manufacturing, shipping, etc., then obviously the price of the product should not be the same.  A lot of authors experimenting with self-publishing on Kindle use the $2.99 price point, which I think is fair.  The author gets 70% of that, which is far higher than the royalty rate you’d get from a traditional publisher.  $2.99 is also the lowest price at which Amazon offers that rate.  Below that, it drops to 30%, which is still good, but overall $2.99 is best.  I wouldn’t suggest pricing above that if you’re an unknown.  There’s simply too many other unknown writers competing for the attention of consumers, so obviously if you price your book higher than what everybody else is offering, you’ll probably get passed over by most eBook buyers.  I also take issue with the big publishers pricing digital editions of new releases at the same price or nearly the same price as a paper book.  It’s not just absurd, it’s a ripoff.  The music industry used to gouge consumers with overly inflated CD prices.  Compact discs cost very little relatively to manufacture, yet there was this insanely huge markup.  Eventually it backfired on that industry, and I suspect the same thing will happen here.

TPF: I’d like to switch gears and ask about your writing method. How do you write? By that, I mean what’s your process? Do you outline or let the story take you where it may?

BS: I don’t outline.  Ever.  Different writers have different approaches.  Some will swear that an outline is absolutely necessary to the process.  On the other hand, Stephen King has said that he doesn’t outline, as have many other very successful authors.  To me, outlining takes the fun and sense of discovery out of writing.  So I prefer to let the story develop organically.  Every now and then something doesn’t work out, an idea fizzles, but that doesn’t bother me.  I just move on to the next thing.  Outlining would make me feel too much like I was back in school, putting together some dry paper for some boring class.  Some weird people enjoy that, I guess.  I don’t.  Put it this way–I think “School’s Out” by Alice Cooper is a great song.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Walk on the Dark Side With Nate Kenyon

Dear Partnas in Crime:

I remember the first time I picked up a novel by Nate Kenyon. I had recently

Author Nate Kenyon

gone through a dry spell of mediocre horror. Nothing was catching yo boy’s fancy. Each horror novel read like the last, and I was disgusted with the output. How could they possibly put out the same damn book three times, only by different authors who used different character names and different titles? It made no sense. To be honest with you, I was about to abandon the notion of reading new horror writers altogether…until I came upon Nate Kenyon. I picked up his book, expecting the same old shit, and instead became a lifelong fan. If you haven’t read Kenyon, you need to. This guy is a great writer. That’s why I sent the Pudge Factor in for an exclusive:

THE PUDGE FACTOR (TPF):  Nate, one of my personal favorite works by you was “Sparrow Rock.” Can you tell us what inspired you to write this tale and what research went into the writing of this tale? Why are you a horror writer?

NATE KENYON (NK): SPARROW was inspired by a short story I wrote years ago called ACID RAIN. It was really just the opening scene of the novel, more or less, and nothing much actually happened–which is probably why it never was published anywhere. But I loved the set up, and I kept it on the back burner in my mind for a while. Eventually, when my publisher needed a new novel, I started playing with it–doing the “what if” game, dreaming of who these kids were, and how they had ended up down in the hole–and my imagination just exploded with possibilities.

I researched as I wrote it. On the one hand, I wanted some authenticity to the story–I wanted the affects from the bombs to be somewhat realistic, I wanted to know how long they would be down there, etc. And I wanted to make the “creatures” they eventually encounter be just scientific enough to be believable. But I didn’t want to slow down the story either. So I researched as needed. That said, there is a fair amount in the book that is frighteningly plausible!

As for why I write horror, I’m not really sure. My mind always just ends up on the dark side of things. Probably due to the trauma I suffered in childhood. I think the process of writing SPARROW is a good microcosm of that–I was going through some pretty rough personal stuff at the time, and it certainly came out in my writing. You can’t get much more apocalyptic than I did with this one!

TPF: Of all the books you’ve written, do you have a favorite one or one that was harder to write than the others? If so, why?

NK: My favorite is probably SPARROW. It came out pretty easily, actually–never even needed a rewrite. I just love the story and the characters–and particularly the major twists. I set out to try to do something with this book that is very difficult to do in fiction, and the challenge was a lot of fun–and according to most readers I hear from, I pulled it off. That’s a real rush. Those who have read it probably know what I’m talking about, and as for everyone else–read it and find out!

TPF: Can you give us some insight into any current projects you’re working on and when they will come out?

NK: My new novel is STARCRAFT GHOST: SPECTRES, based on the bestselling videogame franchise by Blizzard Entertainment. It came out in September from Pocket Books, and it is a ton of fun. I’m finishing a DIABLO novel for Blizzard and Pocket now, which will be out next Spring. DIABLO fans, as well as fans of my own work, are going to love this book. I also have a short story in the anthology The Monster’s Corner, coming from St. Martins this fall.

TPF:  How did the collapse of Dorchester impact you? Have you obtained all your rights back to your works?

NK: I haven’t said much publicly about this, but I think it’s time for the gloves to come off. I had already decided not to do another book with them and signed on with Pocket, so it didn’t affect my new work. But it’s completely tied up my backlist. Dorchester is still selling my titles as ebooks without my permission, even though my agency has asked them repeatedly to return my rights, and as far as I’m concerned they are in breach of contract. I haven’t seen a dime of royalties in over a year. The entire situation makes me furious, and if the greater public knew the kind of business they are running, I think they would be shocked. This is stealing, plain and simple. It’s a shame what they are getting away with–not just with me, but with many of their current and former authors.

TPF: Recently, the eBook phenomenon has become a huge topic of conversation in the writing world. I’d like to get your input on it. These days, with anyone capable of publishing his/her own work as an eBook via Smash Words or Amazon, do you feel this is diminishing the quality of books available to the public. Do you think that the increase in badly formatted, poorly written, badly edited books will affect the future of the eBook market?

NK: Not really, no. I’m a big fan of emerging technologies, and I think the ebook move is inevitable. It just makes sense. I don’t think the deluge of self-pubbed stuff really changes the market much–most readers can tell at a glance what is legit, and I think peer reviewing is going to gain more weight as we move forward. People trust their friends, they will continue to trust legit publishers, and they will read more samples before buying the full book. The market will take care of itself.

TPF: What do you feel is the best route for a beginning author? Should he/she take a traditional approach, sending out manuscripts to literary agents and publishing companies, or should the writer self-publish through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and other outlets?

NK: That’s a tough question. I think it’s changing, honestly–there are more paths forward than before. Self-pubbing is a legit way to go. Of course you have to be good, and your stuff has to be ready for readers. On balance, I think writers should still try to break through using the traditional route, but they should think long and hard about other options. One thing NOT to do: never pay a vanity or subsidy press to publish something. That’s the kiss of death.
TPF: What do you think about pricing an eBook? Should an author who is unknown to the public price his/her books as low as possible?

NK: Yeah, I think so. I think all eBooks should be priced lower than print versions. I don’t but the publisher argument that they are almost as expensive to produce. Let’s use the flexibility, speed and lower cost to market and pass some of those savings on to readers.

TPF: What are your plans for future works? Do you plan to self-publish, or will you continue to publish through publishing companies?

NK: Probably both. I have a couple of things up on Kindle myself. But I’m still going to publish through larger houses. They provide legitimacy, an established path to market and readers. I’m not convinced that their model is sustainable long term, and I think they’re going to have to give more in royalties for ebooks, but for now, it’s still the best way to go if you can do it.

TPF: I’d like to switch gears and ask about your writing method. How do you write? By that, I mean what’s your process? Do you outline or let the story take you where it may?

NK: I’ve done both. I used to write only with bare notes and make things up as “they happened.” But with my larger contracts I’ve had to provide more solid outlines and detailed notes, so it’s changed things a bit. I’ve also had to be more disciplined about the time I write–so these days I get up about 5 am, write for three hours, go to work, come home and crash. If I’m on deadline, I’ll write some at night too.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Talking About Sex and Horror II: Day of the Werewolf

Dear Partnas in Crime:

I’m delighted to present to you part II of author W.D. Gagliani’s guest blog.

Author W.D. Gagliani

Ramping Up the Horror: The Werewolf Gene

By W.D. Gagliani

 As the author of four novels and a novella about Milwaukee Homicide Detective Dominic “Nick” Lupo, who is also a werewolf, I am often asked what attracted me to werewolves. Why did I choose that particular monster to tell my stories? And why Horror, anyway? (People I approach in bookstores often ask that, after wrinkling their noses in displeasure. “There’s already so much horror in the world,” some say. “Exactly!” I say, agreeing. I feel compelled to reflect reality. Those people never buy my book.)

Of course, if given the chance to expound, I always explain that I was drawn to the tragedy of Larry Talbot in “The Wolf Man,” the Universal movie that started my interest in the werewolf. And even though it was a comedy, “Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein” (Universal as well) made an impact, because as fans know, the monsters were handled in a straight-faced manner, so Talbot (also played by Lon Chaney, Jr.) was quite tragic in this one, too. Even in a comedy, Talbot was so tortured a human being, so torn up about being a monster – against his will – that it truly affected me. At the end, he sacrifices himself in order to rid the world of Dracula’s evil. It’s not hard to see the werewolf in a tragic and heroic light at that moment, and the feeling stayed with me. I loved the gray areas between what he had been, what he was, and what he was compelled to be.

The horror of being a monster against your will, of being capable of killing and dismembering even those you love, that’s the kind of thing that stays with you, and it certainly stayed with me. But I kept thinking that instead of being the antagonist, it was more interesting to cast the monster as the hero. Given the werewolf’s history, that was rather subversive. Let’s look at that history.

In the Dark Ages, hundreds of people were tried and executed for committing the crime of lycanthropy. Unfortunately, the accused were probably either mentally ill, people who suffered from porphyria, rabies, or other diseases, or just victims of simple neighborly revenge for slights real and imagined. It was difficult to prove you weren’t a werewolf if you were accused by a so-called witness. Your word against theirs, and you would have been regarded with suspicion no matter what you said in your defense. They took their werewolves almost as seriously as their witches, maybe more so due to the much more monstrous nature of the beast and the results of its attacks. Even witches didn’t savagely dismember and devour parts of their victims. These aren’t known as the Dark Ages because of people’s enlightened open-mindedness, that’s for sure. If the original animal attacks weren’t horrific enough, imagine the court-ordered torture and executions. Horror created on both sides of the equation. Sometimes we just need to face the fact that humans are actually more monstrous than the so-called monsters. I’ve devoted much of my writing career to exploring this phenomenon.

In a time when mysterious forces were thought to impose their cruel punishment on a sinful people, and when hunger ruled the land, it wasn’t entirely unexpected that attacks by starving wolves on humans would be interpreted as predation by supernatural shapeshifters. Occasionally, they might have been attributed to human enemies disguised as wolves either to throw off suspicion or because the attacker really believed he or she was a werewolf. In any case, sentencing would be swift and punishment swifter. After all, how could one prove a negative? If one didn’t manifest as a wolf on request, it didn’t mean one wouldn’t shapeshift at the first opportunity. Best keep the opportunities to a minimum then! Once accused, it was impossible to throw off the mantle of monster. And the punishment, burning at the stake or disembowelment or beheading, would be infinitely worse. Interesting how “justice” actually ramped up the horror of the original crime – humans can be as bloodthirsty as the monsters they fear.

Most older European cultures tell tales of shapeshifting, and even as a kid in mid to late Sixties Italy (where I grew up), I was exposed to the occasional tabloid appearances of the lupo mannaro, which continued to fuel superstition especially in more rural southern Italy. (One of these news articles appears in a short section of my new thriller, Wolf’s Edge. I remember it well, though my grandmother did not ban me from reading it as Lupo’s grandmother does in the book.) As a writer who loves the werewolf mythology, I’ve found particular enjoyment in blending the European with the Native American when possible, though numerous other writers have done so before me, most notably Charles de Lint, whose urban fantasies were also influential to me.

Taking another look at movies, screenwriter Curt Siodmak is usually attributed with several movie-oriented werewolf characteristics, including the aversion to silver, which doubles as the werewolf’s kryptonite, and the pentagram business which identifies the next victim. Siodmak wrote the screenplay for The Wolf Man (1941), in which Lon Chaney, Jr., played the tragic Talbot. Tragic because he hated the monster he had become, a trait eminently minable for great material. It’s always been apparent to me that most vampire figures enjoy what they are, or have come to embrace it. But the original Larry Talbot – like many other movie werewolves –  is definitely more ambivalent about his condition, more likely to consider it a curse. (Exception exist, like Jack Nicholson’s Wolf, in which he realizes his lycanthropy might be a good way to cuddle up to Michelle Pfeiffer. Who wouldn’t consider that a boon?) If you consider your lycanthropy a curse, then every aspect of your cursed life would have to he horror, wouldn’t it? When I introduced other werewolves into the series, I chose to make them a contrast to Lupo – they enjoy wolfing out, so the horror is what they perpetrate on their many victims.

If you crave a good, old-fashioned men vs. werewolves tale, then Dog Soldiers is a movie for you. Of course there are plenty of other werewolf movies to throw into the mix, and I’d be remiss if I left out the excellent An American Werewolf in London, The Howling, and Wolfen. On the literary side, one shouldn’t overlook the influence of Gary Brandner’s The Howling, S.P. Somtow’s Moon Dance, and Robert McCammon’s The Wolf’s Hour, a novel which also operates in the realm of historical fiction (and greatly influenced me, as well). All of these have their share of good vs. evil in them, but you will always be able to delve more into the subject when you climb into your character’s head and look through his or her eyes.

The werewolf motif operates well as a metaphor for the concept of duality. Two personalities, two creatures, united inside one body. The beast within. We all have a dark side, a side which will choose cruelty over kindness for whatever reason. The wolf and human parts are at war, and the stronger side exerts control. In most mythologies, the shapeshifter has little or no control. If the moon is the supreme influence, then it’s the moon that induces the Change. Certainly this condition ramps up horror – the poor werewolf is a monster whose own family and lovers are in terrible danger of being disemboweled and consumed, which is the greatest taboo to humans. I’ve used this motif to good effect, I think, in the Lupo books.

A more recent metaphor has arisen, one in which the beast within is understood to represent raging hormones and lycanthropy becomes a thinly-veiled exploration of puberty. As wide a range of movies as Teen Wolf and Ginger Snaps have examined various aspects of teenage angst, both male and female. These tend to downplay the truly horrific in order to make their points, but I’ve used the metaphor in presenting my parallel Lupo stories in flashback, stories in which Nick Lupo the teenager learned to cope with his condition – or often learned that he couldn’t cope, or that he couldn’t avoid being a monster, or hurting those he loved. To me, that was the essence of ramped-up horror!

Yes, for some people horror is all about romance and love and vampires. I’ve always seen the werewolf as the toughest of the monsters, because he’s not killed as easily as dragging him into the dawn. Not everyone has a silver bullet handy, after all. The vampire may have ruled all these many years as the most popular and appealing of the classic monsters, but the day of the werewolf is fast approaching – or perhaps it’s already here. Beware what lurks in the dark woods – and in the hearts of men.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Talking About Sex and Horror

Dear Partnas in Crime:

Jimmy is excited to announce his first guest blog. Horror and crime writer

Author W.D. Gagliani

W.D. Gagliani has graciously decided to discuss sex in fiction and how to write a damned good horror story. This is a two part blog, with the second post dropping Saturday morning. Prepare to be entertained and educated my fellow writers. And now, Jimmy is pleased to present the feature presentation:

Let’s Talk About Sex for a Minute

By W.D. Gagliani

(Adapted from a previous essay)

 

We writers often are what we read when we were kids.

Some of the lessons, some of the preferences, some of the secret delights stick with us all the way to adulthood.

So occasionally I’ve been asked: where does all that sex come from?

I blame Harold Robbins.

Sure, he’s not alone.

It started with some other warping influences.

Well, this author admits, something had to help warp him. Maybe that liberal Seventies upbringing did the trick – except for a brief period of bizarre parental suppression that involved Hardy Boys books. Maybe it was the relentless reading of everything and anything, including the first edition of  Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex*(*But Were Afraid to Ask), the very first The Joy of Sex, the novelization of the movie Last Tango in Paris, and most likely the traffic in illicit contraband reading material conducted with relative who had access to Playboy and Penthouse and other Seventies-era men’s magazines, as well as the potboiler novels of Harold Robbins and the satirical sex novels of Ted Mark (believe it or not, starting with the James Bond parody The Man From O.R.G.Y. – no, really, look it up!). Not much later, along came the legendary bondage epic The Story of O, Alan Lelchuk’s novel American Mischief (which was recently reprinted as a minor classic!), and let’s not forget Xaviera Hollander’s, um, seminal The Happy Hooker. Brett Halliday’s sexy Mike Shayne mysteries made the cut, too (take a moment to check out those great pulp covers). Of course, all these found their way to me along with my more oft-mentioned, less racy, influences.

Yeah, sure, we are what we read.

I read a lot of that sexy Seventies stuff, and apparently it left a mark. The mark of the beast, according to some. To my impressionable mind, however, somehow it all went in the hopper of my imagination. Corrupted imagination, maybe, but still…

What happens when you blend Jules Verne and fantasy with mystery and crime and that other kind of fantasy? Toss in your Ian Fleming (precociously read in 5th and 6th grade) and an endless succession of Harold Robbins alternating with mostly uptight British thrillers by the likes of Alistair MacLean and Duncan Kyle, and the mélange created might well resemble the Wolf series I started with Wolf’s Trap, continued with Wolf’s Gambit and the third volume, Wolf’s Bluff, and now encompassing Wolf’s Edge and a soon to be released novella, Wolf’s Deal.

A lesson I learned from Harold Robbins: sex complicates the lives of characters.

Seems obvious, doesn’t it?

Though he was often dismissed as a hack, one thing you can say about Robbins is that he knew how to tell a rollicking story and keep your interest. How? Well, in just about every other chapter some character would fall into bed (or whatever was handy) and just have sex, lots of dangerous and sometimes taboo sex, the underline the good parts and dog-ear the pages kind of sex for which young male adolescents would eagerly keep turning the pages.

Using Robbins as possibly the best example of the Seventies’ much freer attitude toward sex, his novels were set in various broadly exciting settings (a Latin American revolution, the auto industry, political campaigns, the world of Hollywood jet-setters, the Mafia, etc.), and alternated  melodramatic action/reaction, much of it violent, with heaping helpings of sex. The sex was titillating, of course, but it also defined the characters and – most importantly – complicated their lives as they became submerged in their debauchery. Their relationships were often irreparably tangled by infidelities, betrayals, and what we would now call sex addictions but in those days, when referring to female characters, was labeled nymphomania. The males were just horny, and that was normal, of course! (I said the Seventies were liberal, but not that they weren’t sexist.)

Probably one of the reasons I gravitated toward horror was the intriguing aspect of sex that plays out, perhaps subliminally, in just about every major work in the genre. It’s no accident that horror movies are sex-drenched (and so many teenagers get the axe after doing the deed). Sex and death, blah blah blah. Pain and pleasure, yada yada… you’ve heard it all before.

But I found my interest was slightly different. I wanted the use the sex to complicate characters’ lives while it titillated, but not necessarily have it lead to their deaths. This is why you won’t find too many of the more typical sex-and-horror tropes in the Wolf novels. No razorblades drawn across tongues, not a lot of genital mutilation (except that done by hungry werewolves!), not a whole lot of  blood-drinking, and generally not much violence tied directly to the sex. After the sex, well, that’s a whole new, er, game. Occasionally, it’s desirable to imply the possibility that someone might be killed or mutilated during the act, but then end up withholding the violence as a sort of twist. A non-climax, an interruptus, as it were.

In Wolf’s Trap, a serial killer’s upbringing twists his view of sex until his love-hate relationship with sex erupts in vengeful violence. In Wolf’s Gambit, sex complicates the lives of Nick Lupo and an alluring television reporter named Heather Wilson, who finds herself craving the most dangerous sex imaginable – with a stone killer. In Wolf’s Bluff, Heather’s ways would have her labeled a nymphomaniac in the Seventies… and she drags Lupo out of his good guy comfort zone to that shadowy area between the good and the evil. The werewolf gene heightens libido, you see, and acting upon the changes definitely complicates characters’ lives. In the upcoming Wolf’s Edge…. Well, you’ll have to read it to find out how sex plays a role.

For my tendency to use sex this way in my books, you can thank the stuff I read when I was a kid.

But mostly you should blame Harold Robbins.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Breaking Bad with Maurice Broaddus

Dear Partnas in Crime:

I’ve recently had a couple of conversations with some friends online,

Author Maurice Broaddus

and we talked about book covers.

They said to me, “Jimmy, a book cover isn’t that important…it’s what’s on the inside.” I disagreed with this, saying, “Man, I discovered some of my favorite authors by buying books based solely on the cover. The cover is what makes you want to look on the inside.” And this is exactly how I discovered Maurice Broaddus. I remember reaching a period when I was getting sick of always reading the same writers, but it seemed like there just wasn’t anything out there to capture my attention. A friend of mine told me about a forum on Shroud, the horror magazine. I went there, looked around, and wound up checking out the books. There was one cover that kept me going, “What the hell is this?” Let me tell y’all something, I’m cheap. I’ll admit it. I went to the library, requested an interlibrary loan for Devil’s Marionette, and crossed my fingers. Nope, no library in the system had it. That cover was driving me crazy. What was this book about?

Finally, I broke down and went to Amazon.com and did something I rarely used to do back in the day. I bought the novella. And man am I glad I did. Maurice is a great writer, and it seems like he continues to improve with each work. I had to interview Maurice because I wanted to know about his writing process and what his thoughts are on the eBook phenomenon. I sent The Pudge Factor in for the scoop.

 

THE PUDGE FACTOR (TPF): Maurice, I’ve heard a lot of good things about your series, The Knights of Breton Court. Can you tell us what the series is about and what inspired you to write it? Did you put any research into it? If so, what did you research?

MAURICE BROADDUS (MB): The Knights of Breton Court follows the legend of King Arthur and his knights except recontextualized in inner city Indianapolis. I’m pretty much a “write what you know” sort of guy. I had been working with homeless teenagers through a local ministry called Outreach Inc. We had been working on some writing exercises, trying to re-imagine each other in different contexts, and I made the off-hand remark about how they were princes and princesses of the streets. The image resonated with me. Other than that, I basically was just writing about my neighborhood and life through the eyes of the teens. Though I did spend a lot of time reading a ton of material on the Arthurian cycle.

TPF: Of all the books you’ve written, do you have a favorite one or one that was harder to write than the others? If so, why?

MB: King’s Justice may be my favorite novel. Probably precisely because it was harder to write and felt more personal.

TPF: Can you give us some insight into any current projects you’re working on and when they will come out?

MB: Currently I’m going over the last edits of the last novel in my Knights of Breton Court trilogy, King’s War. It should be out in November. I’m also working on a couple of steampunk projects: one’s a Jamaican steampunk tale called “Steppin’ Razor” and the other is a novelization of my short story, “Pimp My Airship.” At least one of them will be out in late 2012.

TPF: Recently, the eBook phenomenon has become a huge topic of conversation in the writing world. I’d like to get your input on it. These days, with anyone capable of publishing his/her own work as an eBook via Smashwords or Amazon, do you feel this is diminishing the quality of books available to the public? Do you think that the increase in badly formatted, poorly written, badly edited books will affect the future of the eBook market?

MB: When I’m feeling optimistic, I think it’s like anything else: when there’s so much crap, the cream will rise to the top. When I’m feeling less charitable, I think that those who self-publish need to find a way to police one another. There needs to be some sort of gatekeeper because when SO much is garbage, it taints everyone. Just follow any boom then bust cycle.

TPF: What do you feel is the best route for a beginning author? Should he/she take a traditional approach, sending out manuscripts to literary agents and publishing companies, or should the writer self-publish through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and other outlets?

MB: I don’t think of it as an either or situation. The publishing landscape is constantly changing, but one thing that’s not is that a writer needs to learn and hone their craft, period. The reason I dedicated so many years writing stories, polishing them, sending them out, getting rejected, getting feedback, revising them again, sending them out again was to learn how to write better. You get better by doing and I’ve learned that we’re often the worst judges of our own material. I’ve also spent time studying the business of writing, from editing to marketing and promotion.

I say all that to say there’s nothing wrong with either approach, just know what you’re doing when you go down your chosen path. I, personally, would be leery of the attitude of just cause I *can* self-publish that I *should* self-publish. If I were to go that route, I’d still run my stories through rounds with editors and still develop a marketing plan. Because our stories are our resumes and there’s nothing worse than having stories out there before they’re ready.

TPF: What do you think about pricing an eBook? Should an author who is unknown to the public price his/her books as low as possible?

MB: I’ve only kept a casual eye on the pricing of eBooks. From what I’ve seen, $2.99 – 3.99 seems to be the sweet spot. Look, writing takes time and work, and I want to be treated like what I’ve produced is worth something. If I want to just give it away, then I’d just post it on my blog and be done with it.

TPF: What are your plans for future works? Do you plan to self-publish, or will you continue to publish through publishing companies?

MB: I take my future on a project by project basis. If I think I have a project that has a narrow niche or that I believe in that I know traditional publishing companies would take a pass on, then I’d look at self-publishing. If my fanbase is built up to such a degree that they would follow me into self-publishing, I’d take a look at that too.

TPF: I’d like to switch gears and ask about your writing method. How do you write? By that, I mean what’s your process? Do you outline or let the story take you where it may?

MB: I’ve come to realize that it’s a little of both. I generally outline because I like to have an idea of where I’m going. (The few times I’ve just “let the story take me where it may” usually ends up with me trashing a third or more of the final work because “taking me where it may” typically means meandering til I get to where something happens). So for a novel, I’ll loosely outline the whole thing. What typically happens right around the mid-way point is that I have to stop. The characters haven’t stuck to the outline, the story has morphed into something unexpected, so I’ll go over what I’ve done and re-outline from that point.

TPF: Please feel free to add anything you’d like to discuss in this interview.

MB: I have a novella coming out this October from Delirium books called “Bleed With Me”. The hard copy is sold out already, but it will be available as an eBook. Then King’s War comes out in November, available in bookstores as a mass market paperback as well as eBook. I have a dozen or so short stories coming out from various markets over the next few months, so to keep up to date with those, visit me at www.mauricebroaddus.com or follow me on Twitter (http://twitter.com/#!/MauriceBroaddus) or Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/mauricebroaddus).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment